On 11/22/21 8:52 AM, Jeremy Elson wrote:
I did not see any such setting in the Rigol, but I'll check again. in April
I did write to Rigol to report the problem and had the following (abridged)
conversation with support:
Me:
"I recently tried to use your DG1022Z signal generator to generate one
pulse-per-second (pulse mode, frequency 1.000000hz, width 10 microseconds).
However, it appears there is a small frequency error of one part in 1e11,
i.e. the pulse per second gets later by about 6 nanoseconds every 1,000
seconds." [More technical description abridged, including a link to a
graph.]
Rigol:
"Please find the following datasheet for DG1000Z, the accuracy is +/-1ppm.
If your pulse is 1second with 10us width, 6ns per 1000s is in the accuracy
range." [They attached an image of a page from the DG1000Z datasheet,
showing a line that said "Accuracy: +/- 1ppm of the setting value"]
Me:
"Is this the specification even when the unit is provided with an accurate
external clock?"
Rigol:
"I would say Yes. The internal processing circuit will effect the clock
signal, harmonics and phase noise will result the frequency variance."
-Jeremy
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 11:54 PM Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk>
wrote:
I've noticed that a lot of modern test equipment (Keysight 33622
function generator as a concrete example) handles an external reference
differently than one might expect. Historically, you'd think a signal
generator or counter or TBD would have a 10 MHz oscillator as a time
base, and feeding in an external reference replaces that.
Today, though, their internal time base could be almost anything at any
frequency. What they do is compare that against the external reference,
and implement either some sort of frequency locked loop. This might be
analog pushing of their internal reference smoothly, or it might be a
period stepwise correction (e.g. reprogramming a DDS), or something else.
In any case, I would NOT expect the test equipment to improve its phase
noise or ADEV to that of the external reference (unless the manual
explicitly says that). I would expect that the dial reading would
follow the external source. If the internal source had drifted 10ppm,
then 10.000000 MHz on the display could be 10.000,100 MHz at the output
jack, but with an external source, it would be 10.000000 (or maybe +/-
10 Hz, if 1ppm is the spec).
In addition, one cannot assume that there is any consistent phase
relationship between the external source and the output of the test
equipment. Connecting a pair of 33622 generators to the same source,
and expecting the outputs to be synchronized will be unsuccessful. They
will be syntonized to within the tolerance of the device, but
synchronization depends on using the sync inputs, with the precision of
synchronization determined by the internal oscillators which are fairly
high frequency, but not phase locked to the external source. So if the
internal clocks were, say, 200 MHz, then the sync between two generators
is no better than the period of 5 ns.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an
email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
