On Wednesday 24 August 2005 20.56, Nick Warne wrote: > To be honest, now thinking about this, the pool is unique (I would think) > in the way servers can drop out of the 'pool' and others pop back in > again, with the DNS in a constant flux. DNS was never really designed > for this sort of relative short lived records, ever constantly changing > over small periods of time.
Well, perhaps somebody can root out some renegade spammers or so, they've been doing this sort of low-TTL DNS hackery for some time now... :-/ -- vbi -- I have a dream: 1073741824 bytes free.
pgpt889DTQkET.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
