On Tuesday 20 December 2005 14.32, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Its the default, with a the "server" lines changed (and the comments > stripped out to make it shorter for posting).
I didn't see you saying that you modified the servers lines, and I knew that Debian by default had only 1 pool server + local clock - didn't match your posting. I didn't look further at the moment. > That certainly shouldn't > cause ntpd to become abusive to the tune of polling once per second. I guess we agree fully that ntpd should never behave as it apparently does for you - default config file or not. There are no ntpd hackers on this mailing list that I know of, so your best bet is move this issue over to the comp.protocols.time.ntp newsgroup (or the mailing list gated to it, the name of which I never can remember...) And of course it may be prudent to file a bug report against Debian's ntp package if it is not there already. (Dunno how much you know about Debian: see http://bugs.debian.org/ntp-server, and best use the 'reportbug' tool to report the bug - you may have to install it first.) cheers -- vbi P.S.: just curious: what kind of question mark did you use in the subject line? '‽' - some weird unicode character... -- BOFH excuse #69: knot in cables caused data stream to become twisted and kinked
pgpZ5BmoZMVxZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
