On Oct 13, 2007, at 9:50, Evandro Menezes wrote: > And it seems that allowing for 100ms offset due to network traffic > is perhaps too much leeway. [...]
For now 100ms is "close enough". For SNTP clients it's plenty accurate. As you noticed, ntpd/NTP clients will figure out to pick another server. > Finally, instead of an SNTP-way of probing the servers, why not run > NTP with a appropriate minpoll and noselect to evaluate the actual > offset better? Mostly because ntpd doesn't let you remove and add servers "online", so it'd take longer to add a new server to the monitoring. For the future distributed monitoring I'm planning to set it up that way though. - ask -- http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/ _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
