Björn Gabrielsson wrote on 27-10-2007 23:00: > On Sat, October 27, 2007 20:40, Jan Hoevers said: >> J.A.C.M. (Jos) van de Ven wrote on 27-10-2007 20:19: >>> Jan, >>> >>> I used command ntpq -p awk.xs4all.nl! >>> Interesting servers you have. I read somewhere to use different network >>> paths, in case one or more paths fail. >>> You only have 3 as I can see. Do you think that is reliable enough? It >>> seems >>> to me a kind of "prefer" setting if you have 9 servers on same path. >> You're absolutely right Jos. My setup is no good in that aspect, and >> still under test. >> As you already guessed the next step is to select two of the swedish >> servers and go for the next network path. >> >> Still, sub-millisecond accuracy was beyond my expectations with 3 >> different paths. I think that illustrates use of a nanokernel is useful, >> even when synchronizing over the internet. > > Are you sure the Stupi servers ARE going the same way. Last time I heard, > they did use different pipes coming into the same location.
Thanks Bjorn, that's interesting. I investigated the path to the netnod servers and just assumed stupi was connected to netnod. I'm in nl; I guess the trajectory Amsterdam - Malmo is the same. So Jos was at least partly right when he criticized that. Jan _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
