Dennis Hilberg, Jr. wrote on 27-10-2007 22:47: > Jan Hoevers wrote: >> Dennis Hilberg, Jr. wrote on 27-10-2007 20:40: >>> Right, but your system is only *accurate* to it's synchronization distance, >>> which is the root dispersion + 1/2 the root delay. >>> >>> Your server, as viewed from my stratum one, has rootdelay=29.432 ms and >>> rootdispersion=46.082 ms. That's a synch distance of 60.798 ms, even >>> though >>> your reported offset in the same output is offset=-0.939 ms. >> I'll have to do some reading on that first. >> >> I've tested my system from two different locations over the internet >> (and compared it with gps). It is certainly not 60 ms off. > > No no, it's not 60 ms off, it's -0.939 ms off. Ok, so I'm taking advantage of that nona kernel. That was my point.
> Sorry, I should have worded that differently. The confusion was started by me maybe, using the word "accuracy" without clearly defining it. It's about granularity rather than accuracy. Thanks for your Mills quote, I'll spend some time on it the next few days. Jan _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
