On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Arnold Schekkerman wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This reply is of list, as I don't think this reply belongs there.
>
>
> IMHO the 'official' ntpd-list or news group does not really listen if your
> name is not Mills, or if the name of your teacher is not Mills. It's a bit
> of a shame. If you come up with valid arguments, but mr. Mills sees
> otherwise, the discussion ends.

Agreed, I have named that the "ntp mentality" before on this list ;-)
>
>
>
> If ntpd measures 4 servers, every 20 minutes it gathers 12 measurements per
> hour, 288/day. So if your system runs for half a year or so, ntpd has a huge
> amount of info it *can* use, but it doesn't. You can see it when you restart
> your system and let it cool down to room temperature in between. It takes
> hours with very large frequency changes in between.
>
> The same applies to the leap second (or a false one) if not all upstream
> servers agree. Ntpd went crazy on some systems (I firewalled the systems
> that did not announce the right leap info and all went by smooth here). I
> argued in the group that ntpd should use all the historic data to build up a
> bit more trust in the local clock and that it should never jump back and
> forth between two groups of servers (one with and one without the leap),
> causing very large offsets (much more than 1s) because of huge
> overcompensation of the local frequency. Mills said I should read the
> Byzantium problem and that closed the discussion for the 'insiders'. The
> best 'we' got was the acknowledgement of Mills & Co that ntpd was not stable
> on some systems.
>
> Anyway, Louis, I like your way of thinking :-)
> Perhaps it is worthwhile to help openNTP to improve the algorithm? That
> seems to be the week part. It is more secure and has better design than ntpd.
>
Indeed !

Cheers,

> Kind regards,
>   Arnold &:-)
> --
>                           \|/ ____ \|/  E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You can't confuse him,      @~/ ,. \~@   Fight for your right on PRIVACY!
> he's not paying attention. /_( \_ / )_\  Use PGP!    http://www.gnupg.org
>                              \__U_/
>
> The manual said 'Windows XP or better'...
>           ...so I use Linux!
>
>

Louis
http://blogtech.oc9.com
http://www.pool.ntp.org/scores/207.236.226.149
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers

Reply via email to