Hi all,

 

As a test I added the "limited" keyword to the restrict line. In my graphs I
could see that I had less outgoing traffic than without this (default)
restriction.

The output of #ntpdc -c sysstats:

 

time since restart:     100282

time since reset:       100282

packets received:       678555

packets processed:      7441

current version:        194568

previous version:       483208

bad version:            0

access denied:          0

bad length or format:   74

bad authentication:     29

rate exceeded:          144880

 

This tells me that 20% of packets are rate exceeded.

 

Without "limited" output of sysstats:

 

time since restart:     219644

time since reset:       219644

packets received:       1580630

packets processed:      16744

current version:        485304

previous version:       1093817

bad version:            0

access denied:          0

bad length or format:   58

bad authentication:     149

rate exceeded:          0

 

Are other users using the limited restriction or do they use other values
for average minimum 5 and minimum 2?

I suppose routers sent all these requests at once for their clients, because
I cannot imagine there are so many abusive clients.

 

A search on fortytwo.ch with google on "kod limited" gave me some hits but
not a good explanation whether I should use it.

 

Jos van de Ven.


---vdveninfo.eu---
The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be 
subject to legal professional privilege. It is intended solely for the 
attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended 
recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the 
intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and 
must not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it.
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers

Reply via email to