Matt Wagner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I joined the pool a few months ago when I set up NTP on a webserver 
> and realized I might as well have it help out the community. I've got 
> a few questions I've acquired over the past few months, which I'll 
> batch together here.
>
> - I'm setting up a new server on the East Coast (US). I'm trying to 
> find some NTP servers that are close (latency-wise), but many of them 
> block ping. Short of adding them to my ntp.conf and restarting, is 
> there a way to test their response time?
ntpdate -q server.address
>
> - A related question: is there a way to modify my server list while 
> the server's running? Halting ntpd, editing the ntpd.conf, and then 
> restarting ntpd is problematic, especially when it takes several 
> minutes for it to get a "fix" upon restarting.
ntpdc if you have keys set up can add and remove servers
>
> - I've never seen a good explanation for when it's appropriate to use 
> the burst/iburst keywords, so I've assumed that it's not appropriate 
> for me to be using them. (My current server is Stratum 2, so I'm 
> particularly worried about placing too much of a load on S1 servers.) 
> Should I leave my settings as-is, or does it makes sense to add them 
> to speed up its resuming service after restarting? (Which is rare.)
short answer - iburst good, burst bad.   I burst sends a burst when you 
first start and gets you synced up fast - setting it on one or two 
servers is reasonable and won't annoy anybody unless you restart a 
lot.   burst sends a burst of traffic every time and is very annoying - 
it's really only useful if you're doing dialup and want to sync then 
disconnect.
>
> - Is support.ntp.org <http://support.ntp.org> consistently (very) slow 
> to load for everyone, or just me? Is this a situation we can help out 
> with somehow?
works OK for me.
>
> - When I set up my server in Texas, there were ample stratum 1 servers 
> with open access policies, allowing me to become a stratum 2 without 
> problems. However, it seems that there are fewer open stratum 1s on 
> the East Coast... Is running a server in the pool considered a good 
> reason to request permission, or should I just stay at stratum 3?
Both answers are ok - stratum three is not a bad neighborhood to live in 
and speaking as a stratum one operator I have no problems with people 
using my S1 server if they are in the pool (even the lowest bandwidth 
pool servers are handling 500+ clients).
>
> Thanks for the help!

Welcome

John

_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers

Reply via email to