All, Here's the link to Mura/Torres report (which I hadn't seen before):
http://www.ntpsurvey.arauc.br/ Thanks, Tim, for bringing it to our attention. >From my own humble stratum 2 pool server, I collected ntp client IP addresses for over a year just for kicks. No stratum (or any other) analysis. The results: Over 7 million clients over the course of the year on a single server. http://www.dayww.net/ntpstats/clients.html As a byproduct, the new DNS approach is apparently quite effective. I was at 100Mbps at the switchover and the daily peaks were effectively squashed. When I bumped it to 1000Mbps, the peaks came back with a vengeance! ...Dave On Tue, March 11, 2008 7:05 pm, Tim Shoppa wrote: > Are there any currently executing NTP surveys, like Guyton's (1994), > Minar's (1999), Mura/Torres (2005)? > > My public NTP servers sometimes have not-so-public (but still accessible > to the wide world) stratum 1's peering with them, and I'm honestly > surprised that only once or twice a year does someone traipse the > ntpq -c peers or ntpdc -c monlist references and end up querying > the not-so-public ones. > > I've done some surveys of my own and counted 640000 mentioned machines, > but I suspect I'm only scratching the surface because so few servers > respond usefully to ntpq -c peers or ntpdc -c monlist > > Tim. > _______________________________________________ > timekeepers mailing list > [email protected] > https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers > _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
