On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 11:53 -0500, Kevin Bralten wrote: > The number of already IPv6 capable servers in the pool was discussed > some time ago. Through a quick search, there are _at_least_ 13 IPv6 > capable machines listed in the pool DNS as of about 10 minutes ago. > [...]
Check your test logic. I don't see my server there for example, which is IPv6 capable since it was born. It has steady 20 points score for last 3 days, therefore i don't see any reason you could've had not to check it. It's submitted IP resolves in revdns to a names which resolves to both A and AAAA records in straight dns. Server in question is 217.153.128.243, listed in global, Europe and Poland pools. Yet, i see some problems with giving IPv6 services under same names as IPv4 ones. IPv6 connectivity is on average much worse. IPv6 itself is considered by many as childish play. Actually it may be much worse - i've noticed the problem on freshly installed IPv6 capable freebsd without configured ipv6 link. Trying to ntpdate my ntp server i've noticed ntpdate was satisfied with AAAA record, but it couldn't connect. No fall back for ipv4 (!) -- Miroslaw "Psyborg" Jaworski GCS/IT d- s+:+ a C++$ UBI++++$ P+++$ L- E--- W++(+++)$ N++ o+ K- w-- O- M- V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t 5? X+ R++ !tv b++(+++) DI++ D+ G e* h++ r+++ y? _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
