Heyho!

On Thursday 01 April 2010 00.32:43 Dreamy wrote:
> [...] When I saw this graph,
> I was really badly surprised:
> 
> http://www.pool.ntp.org/scores/193.87.160.18/graph/score.png

Nothing special here; a few net problems to start with but shaping up ok.

> Does  it  mean  my server is not suitable for pool? What makes me even
> more curious is this graph:
> 
> http://www.pool.ntp.org/scores/193.87.160.18/graph/offset.png

This one *is* odd.

The since wave per se is often seen related to temperature changes.  But 
that'd be with an amplitude of a few (often not even 1) ms, not 100ms or 
more.  (I doubt the pool's monitoring can detect this, AFAIK it's sntp based 
and any such sine wave would be drowned out by the noise caused by network 
latencies.)

Also, network problems don't usually cause this.  ntpd (you *are* using 
ntpd?  Or is it another software?) is quite good at keeping reasonable time 
even on quite bad networks.  And if you'd lose sync, I'd expect the offset 
to drift slowly (usually slowly enough so that it doesn't reach the magical 
boundary where ntpd will hard set the time back to what it gets from its 
"upstream" time servers.)

So something is decidedly wrong with your machine.  A very bad motherboard 
clock perhaps, or the Linux issue Dave Hart has mentioned, perhaps.

(A few very raw numbers: usually I get my server to offsets within 3 to 5ms 
on DSL.  stable sync to offsets within +/-1ms are realistic when you've got 
a good network connection.   So your offsets of up to 100ms are waaaay out.)

cheers
-- vbi

-- 
featured link: http://www.pool.ntp.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers

Reply via email to