On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:17:36 -0400 Dave Dodge wrote: > This patch might be useful (I haven't compared it against current CVS, > though):
Yep, that works. Thanks. On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:59:48 +0200 Fabrice Bellard wrote: > My guess is that it would be possible to come much closer to GCC and BCC in > terms in the performance of the generated code and code size without slowing > down TCC... I still don't know if it is worth the effort ! >From my personal opinion, the best thing about TCC is that it works. But well, if I had to think about optimizations, then I would probably start with making TCC write out some virtual byte code into a file. And then see what I could do with that. --- grischka _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
