On Thursday 08 June 2006 17:36, Jim Cook wrote: > > For example 6.5.2.2 suggests that the call is okay, because the > > promoted argument type (int) is compatible with the promoted parameter > > Is there an online reference for 6.5.2.2, et al.? I don't have a > dead-tree version handy and would be more than happy to research such > things myself before posting questions.
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n1124.pdf --Ivo _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
