I use the Windows version. It seems that the main diffference would be the
layout of the executable and linking; the machine code generation ought to
be the same for all hardware that uses the same instruction set.
Erik
"Laurens Simonis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
monis.com> To
Sent by: [email protected]
tinycc-devel-boun cc
ces+erik_l_nelson
=countrywide.com@ Subject
nongnu.org [Tinycc-devel] Number of downloads
10/10/2006 09:07
AM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nu.org
Hi,
since I've had the windows binaries on my site, I had never actually
looked to the downloadnumbers. Accidentely, I ran into them today.
Turns out that it gets downloaded quite often! Between October 1st, 05:30
and October 8th, 02:49, I got 375 downloads. That's about 1200 a month, by
a quick guess. Perhaps someday, I'll look in to the stats more carefully.
So I guess the support for win32 should not be dropped just yet :)
Cheers,
Laurens
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
======================================================================
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in and transmitted with this
communication is strictly confidential, is intended only for the use of the
intended recipient, and is the property of Countrywide Financial Corporation or
its affiliates and subsidiaries. If you are not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any use of the information contained in or transmitted
with the communication or dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited by law. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately return this communication to the
sender and delete the original message and any copy of it in your possession.
======================================================================
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
