On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:26:24AM +0800, bj wrote: > what is it's difference between mingw except for speed, size ,the fact > that it has no sound and no .rc resource compiling (by default)?
MinGW = GCC GCC received a lot more testing and thus can more likely cope with uncommon C constructs. GCC has more bells and whistles (builtins, C extensions, command line switches) TinyCC is quick & dirty Programs compiled by GCC are faster and smaller Nobody wants to use GCC with -O0 instead of -O2, but this is what you get from TinyCC When GCC is a good human translator, TinyCC is babelfish.altavista.com Daniel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
