Here is my crtn.o. I heard tcc builds executables that are not as well optimized as gcc's. Is this true? As long as tcc won't reduce my execution speed too much I will still use it, I am just curious.
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 22:02 -0400, David A. Wheeler wrote: > Michael Huss: > > I am using Gentoo Linux, with the latest version of portage and the > > portage tree, and I just installed tcc today. I have used it before in > > binary-based distros, but never here. I am getting a strange error now, > > no matter what I try to compile: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ tcc hello-world.c > > /usr/lib/crtn.o: Invalid relocation entry > > Can you attach and post /usr/lib/crtn.o? (Or, if this mailing list can't > handle it, post the file somewhere and post the URL?). I don't have Gentoo; > my first guess is that /usr/lib/crtn.o includes some directive that tcc can't > handle. > > > I was hoping I could use tcc as my C compiler for portage, so it woud > > emerge many times faster, but first I have to know that it is actually > > working. I can mess with my CC variable and break stuff later.;-D > > Cool! > > --- David A. Wheeler > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
crtn.o
Description: application/object
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
