On 8/28/07, Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shawn Rutledge wrote: > > I'd suggest having a look at cmake. It seems to have worked well for > > Chicken Scheme. The configuration is user-friendly (ncurses menus > > rather than having to pass in a lot of --options to ./configure), > > > > Many things can work well enough. Now that we have cmake > on the table, I can put forth omake too, I suppose. > > http://omake.metaprl.org/index.html > Ok, as long as we're being honest, what I really prefer is Ant.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
