shinichiro.h wrote:
Hi,
I was improving x86-64 support these days. Now
- tcc -run should be OK.
- Shared object should be OK.
- make test2 and make test3 run correctly.
Though there should be some bugs, I removed most known bugs except for
ABI incompatibility with GCC. I will slow for a while.
Grischka, IIRC you said that you are planning to release the next
version. If you were waiting because I'm modifying mob branch
frequently, thanks for the consideration. I think my work is ready for
the next release.
Yes, thanks for all your work. Now we can announce TCC-0.9.25
as the first TCc with x64 support, and more people will test it.
Two questions to you:
- The TOK_builtin_malloc/free handlers in tcc.c looked a bit messy.
I'd like to suggest something different:
http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git?a=commitdiff;h=76fe1ed5
Does this what you need?
- Also, I had a version of tcc_relocate() that crams everything into one
buffer allocated by the caller, such that it can be run independent
from a TCCState:
http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git?a=commitdiff;h=495dc312
Would this would work on x64 instead of your version?
Also two questions to everyone:
- I changed some prototypes for libtcc, for tcc_relocate() and two other
http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git?a=commitdiff;h=4a3907a18
I know, people might need to update if they use libtcc in their code.
Does anyone think this is a bad idea (or that the changes are per se)?
- Also, should we make some subdirs now? I was thinking of
* include (tcc stdxxx.h)
* lib (libtcc1.c, bcheck.c, allocaX.S)
* tests (tcctest etc.)
It could look cleaner in the distro but less clean in the makefile(s)
What do you think?
--- grischka
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
