> Maybe I did, but I'm not so interested in the development of the > compiler with the vague purpose of the speed of compiled code at the > expense of quality. You get it wrong. It's not the speed of compiled code that matters, it's rather the speed of compilation and overall simplicity.
> I came to this list to give you the idea, and not to > implement it yourself. If you don't like to accept it (I understand, > implementation is not so trivial), I'm using a different compiler, if I > find it. Finding another compiler is trivial. GCC and clang are obvious candidates. -- Yours sincerely, Dmitry Kushariov _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
