> Do you really believe that the inclusion of unused code in the target
> binary file will be faster than a smart linking?
Maybe it's not, but, since no one is willing to implement the latter anyway, 
why argue?

> Or the implementation
> of this feature will take a lot of megabytes of space in the amount of
> the compiler?
Maybe a single feature wouldn't, but the desire to include all the features 
possible certainly would.

 -- 
Yours sincerely,
Dmitry Kushnariov

_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Reply via email to