> Do you really believe that the inclusion of unused code in the target > binary file will be faster than a smart linking? Maybe it's not, but, since no one is willing to implement the latter anyway, why argue?
> Or the implementation > of this feature will take a lot of megabytes of space in the amount of > the compiler? Maybe a single feature wouldn't, but the desire to include all the features possible certainly would. -- Yours sincerely, Dmitry Kushnariov _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
