Le 18 déc. 2012 à 15:42, grischka <[email protected]> a écrit : > Akim Demaille wrote: >> "make test" is uncommon, and a bit misleading since there is >> a tests directory. Would you object to using the more traditional >> "make check"? > > Sorry, but I don't really see how it is uncommon/misleading to run > the tests in the "tests" directory with "make test".
Well, the shell is eager to complete on "tests" on tab. And the Autotools support "make check", so it is quite common. There is no need to remove "test", check can be a simple alias. I can provide help to provide other useful targets, such as "make dist" and "make distcheck". Actually, is it on purpose that Autoconf and Automake are not used? > Anyway, if you want to revamp our tiny testsuite per se, for example > split the tcctest.c mess into single tests (or theme related chunks) > and/or integrate that with the (by someone recently added) tests2 stuff > then I'll certainly not object to that. ;=) I have still plenty to discover about tcc, but I'll have a look :) What do you think about the VPATH-builds related changes? _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
