Hi Grishka Le 18 déc. 2012 à 21:29, grischka <[email protected]> a écrit :
>> I can provide help to provide other useful targets, such as "make dist" and >> "make distcheck". > > Thomas who manages a distro (debian) might want to comment. It is not so much related to distros than to the ability to wrap correct tarballs. >> Actually, is it on purpose that Autoconf and Automake are >> not used? > > I think so. Tinycc is fast and small. The Autospam chain stands for > being obscenely slow and bloated. Well, a lot of things can be said about these tools, but they get the job done. > Using it would damage Tinycc's karma. As do broken VPATH builds and weirdly written Makefiles :) >> What do you think about the VPATH-builds related changes? > > I think it can't hurt provided it works. Build directories for > the cross-compilers (arm-tcc etc ...) would be nice too. > > Btw, the term "VPATH-builds" seems to be an autospam metabolite, also. Just suggest a name, I don't care much. At least this one is understood by some people. > In an ideal world make would offer name- and option-spaces natively > nowadays, and autospam would just bitrot somewhere as the small script > that it was once before it became a virus. ... I got distracted. There are a lot of viruses that have spread over the world. C for instance, who benefitted from the success of Unix. _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
