On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 07:12:50PM +0200, Daniel Glöckner wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 07:07:34PM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > Mmmmh. Overall I'm more a (A|L)GPL guy but I choose different license for > > different project. For tcc I thought it could make sense since we have only > > libtcc has static lib and many people seem to build stuff around it. > > And if I volunteer to extend the Makefile for a shared libtcc?
We already have rules for libtcc.so.1.0 and libtcc.dll in our Makefile. Daniel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
