Hi,

I didn't read all messages in this lengthy thread, but I happened found my
name mentioned. I'm OK with the change.

Thanks!



On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Milutin Jovanović <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I wrote my email before yours, and example was chosen just to illustrate
> point.
>
> Miki.
> On 2 May 2013 11:52, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 09:22:15AM -0400, Milutin Jovanović wrote:
>> > Do we really think we can convince one another that static is better
>> > then dynamic
>> > linking?
>>
>> That was not my point at all, sorry if it looked that way.
>>
>> > the reasons are not strong enough to warrant the amount
>> > of work necessary
>>
>> This is the main question, are they or are they not.
>> A license which attracts more users may attract more developers as well.
>>
>> Btw, everyone here - thanks for tcc.
>>
>> I am going silent now.
>> Rune
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tinycc-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Reply via email to