Hello Austin ! We did some fixes to tinycc, some of then could be the reason for so may failures on your tests, can you try then again with the tinycc from git to see how it have improved ?
Thanks in advance for your time and attention ! On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Austin English <austinengl...@gmail.com>wrote: > Howdy all, > > I was curious how well TinyCC performs on real world projects, so I > decided to test it on my gentoo machine. I've written a small script > (rebuild_tcc.sh, attached) that will attempt to build all currently > installed packages with tcc. It works by testing that all installed > packages A) use a C compiler, B) work with clang and gcc, then finally C) > building with tcc. > > Note: I'm emerging binary packages, essentially building then discarding > each program, so the tcc compiled binaries aren't used for compiling other > packages. > > The first few rounds of tests help to reduce the noise ratio. For > instance, on my system, I have 855 packages installed. Of that, only 591 > used a C compiler. > > Reducing down, that gave me a list of 473 packages that built using gcc > and clang. Of those, after > http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git/commitdiff/ba286136bf8e48c71ffd6c2fd9ce97e64a6eeeb1, > 231 packages build with tcc, with 242 failed. > > I've attached the good/bad lists and the log from building to this email, > in case you want to try it yourself. > > I haven't tried looking through to see what the most common failures are, > I'll leave that for someone else (along with fixing all the bugs it found > ;) ) > > -- > -Austin > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > >
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
