On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 04:10:48PM +0100, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote: > I followed the code on fossil-scm with printfs on va_start/va_end using the > previous tcc stdargs implementation and it showed me that both the parent > and child do va_end on the same pointer that's why the segfault.
As long as fossil-scm uses fork and not vfork, calling va_end in the parent and child can't be the reason for the segfault. Best regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
