Le dimanche 01 juin 2014, 00:01:06 mobi phil a écrit : > > One of the reasons I put my project on hold is that lot of things are > happening on the repo lot of code changes. Also I did not get clear > feedback if I should care to stay in sync or fork, with other words such > changes would be ever accepted upstream.
Hi (how should I call you? Is mobi fine?), I'm sorry I didn't reply earlier and even more sorry that my answer will not be very satisfying to you. I am not enough familiar with C++ to realize how much complexity would be needed to handle the C++ constructs you want to add so I cannot really give you my opinions. At least, such constructs should not be available by default as one use case of tcc is to use it to quickly test (like in a commit hook) if a code is correct. I know tcc accepts some (all?) GNUism but C++ construct is too much I believe. Also, given all the answers I've seen, I'm willing to believe that the required change would be to big. Besides, I'm not sure many people besides you would be interested in such a feature. So I think it's preferable if you keep it as a fork. If it turns out to be too difficult to maintain on the long term, we could maybe consider some kind of plugin mechanism so that your code would be a plugin enhancing tcc. Best regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
