On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]> wrote: > Le jeudi 18 décembre 2014, 20:00:02 David Mertens a écrit : >> Good catch. I'm not closely acquainted with this particular section of >> code, but your observation looks correct to me, and the fix looks right. > > I have 2 minor nitpick though (I know it's already commited). First, with that > change buf is no longer declared at the start of a block (C89 style) and this > is the coding style used in tcc. Second, it would be more consistent and > clearer to declare it in the same scope as name since they are both used in > the same scope.
Good point. I will fix this later. Sincerely, Lee _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
