Hi,
maybe in the future we will find that the OOP and meta-templates are
based on erroneous principles and that abstraction is a result of
fantasy and not of imagination.
What I ask to myself is why we can write A+B thinking to it as +(A, B)
but not write f(x, y) asx.f(y) without major theories.
Amazes inventiveness of those who conceived and developed Emscripten
that allow us to write web app in C/C++.
s.
Il 28/04/2015 18:57, [email protected] ha scritto:
Hi,
Since version 4.8, gcc is now c++. clang is c++. Furthermore, the c++
standardization body is going bersek in complexity (c++11->c++14...).
I'm worried about compiling an "everyday use" c++ compiler from a C compiler on
on a medium term timeframe. Some critical "user level" applications are written
in the latest c++ dialect, and this dialect will soon be compilable only with
c++ written c++ compiler, hence shutting down for good any C compiler.
I did not say I like c++, quite the opposite actually: I would rather port to
C89/99 any "critical" c++ components.
What are you thoughts about this issue?
regards,
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
