On Oct 28, 2015 23:46, "Sergey Korshunoff" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Michael Matz > > > No, please keep the message > That was a quick fix for the problem.
One does not simply "quick-fix" a globally shared source repo. > > So, please revert. > Revert is not a solition. If gcc don't complain, than a tcc must not > complain too. That is not valid logic for justifying the silencing of a fatal code condition. Duplicate definitions are illegal. We could also claim, "MSVC does this, so tcc must as well." Wrong answer. > What a solution can be: > * a some switch to disable this error message (a simple solution) > How to name it? > > * producing a common symbols by tcc too. Can tcc do this? > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
