> What is "funny" with tinycc is that, due to the lack of optimization,
> compiled code is twice as SLOW as interpreted code

>2000 6.6  Lisp to LAP compiler. LAP is interpreted by a virtual machine 
>embedded in OpenLisp. Speed improvement is about 2x.

>2003 7.5 Lisp to C backend. It was able to compile an application with many 
>lisp files to a standalone executable. Speed improvement is from 10x to 20x

Hard to trust. A tcc compiled program is 80x slower then a gcc compiled..

_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Reply via email to