Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> wrote: > IMHO, nowadays, it would be better for the user if compilers reject ^^^^^^^^ > implicit declaration of functions by default, since warnings can > easily remain unnoticed since an implicit declaration is an obvious > bug or at least very poor & non-standard coding.
Coding styles have changed over the years. I don't disagree with you, but remember that there are millions of lines of C code out there, written who knows how long ago. Compilers have to support such code bases, which is why the C standard didn't disallow implicit declarations. 'nuff said. Thanks, Arnold _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
