On 3/2/2016 6:08 PM, John B wrote:
[snip]
Maybe being upfront with this community was a mistake but I knew that risk and
10/10 would take it again. I just wish you would see that at least I am not
lying to anyone. Again, you ask for kickbacks fine but don't do it in the same
email as trying to take a moral high ground with me.
I would like to say that I greatly respect Daniel's position, much
more than yours.
As for your project, I wish you a sincere good luck. You know,
there are great MIT-licensed JIT compilers around. Happy hacking!
[snip snip]
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] License is too restrictive for real-world use.
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 08:38:45AM +0000, John B wrote:
I love playing around with toys and trying to make them better. It beats
sudoku. But I am not going to surreptitiously steal the software but on
the cooperative flip side of that coin, I don't want to release my code,
either.
After reading your side of the story, I have the feeling that keeping my
parts of TinyCC as LGPL was the right choice.
TinyCC is a small project with very few active developers. If your product
uses TinyCC, you should feel the responsibility of committing improvements
you made back the main project. (If on the other hand your product consists
mainly of a modified version of TinyCC, you can try to convince us by
offering a share of your earnings. ;)
Best regards,
Daniel
--
Cheers,
Kein-Hong Man (esq.)
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
