Hi, On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Мельников Алексей wrote:
--> Urgs. Are you really using digraphs in any production code? --> (Yes, tcc tries to support c99, but, well, I mean, digraphs? Seriously? If you use EBCDIC you have more serious problems with tcc I guess, and if you don't, why use digraphs? Not as bad as trigraphs, but still.)I am searching new ways to use tcc for web developing. And I think digraphs syntax are combined better with html tags.
I see, fair enough. I'll try to refrain from going "huh?" regarding tcc plus web developing (and that <> are special to html and part of every digraph), except in this sentence :)
Ben, have you finished the patch? If so, please post here, have you measured compile time to be unaffected (would be bad if such a seldom used feature would cause a slowdown)?
Ciao, Michael.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
