>This still isn't quite right. The thing is, type->ref.c is -1 for
> an
> unused flex array, so with your example ("char mem[]") your change
> basically boils down to "size += -1 * 1 + 1" (i.e. +=0). But with a
> different type (say int) it's now "size += -1 * 4 + 1" (i.e.
> +=3). So
> this example still fails the same way:
Good catch and patch. Didn't realize type->ref.c could be -1. Seems to
be fixed now.
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
