Hi, Il 03/09/19 07:29, Christian Jullien ha scritto: > Ok, that fine. > Does it means that B (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISC-V#Bit_manipulation) > is currently implemented by soft. IMHO, for system programming it is a must > have. For example, my OpenLisp implementation heavily relies on shift, bit > mask...
I have no idea about how Micahel's implementation goes, but are there C operations that directly map to something in the B extension? Shifts are in the I "extension", and it is the only bit operation that C directly supports. An optimizing compiler can recognize (or support by builtins) more complicated patterns like counting leading zeros or rotating bits, but it doesn't seems to be tinycc's case, does it? Am I missing something? Thanks, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani <g.mascell...@gmail.com> Postdoc researcher - Université Libre de Bruxelles
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
