Thank again for this new tcc contribution which makes sense. Let me make few remarks:
- First, since it works like gcc extension and because tcc already includes "some' gcc compatibility to ease portability between compilers, I would personally vote to include this patch. - I've no clear option if we want to support this extension on Windows. To answer this question: * what we already doing on Windows with gcc specific extensions? * having it, even if not supported by standard vc++, will let to have a single source code that works the same on all tcc supported system * gcc on Windows supports all its extensions unless they conflict with vc++ (are there any?) - Currently, I have the impression that test case is ran also on Windows .. which probably raises an error. That said, if maintainers agree your patch, I would probably prefer it is supported also on Windows which is more in the spirit of what gcc does on different platforms. As usual, I'll be very happy to test it on the different platforms I have access to M2c. Christian -----Original Message----- From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 22:49 To: Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel Cc: Herman ten Brugge Subject: *** SPAM *** [Tinycc-devel] constructor/destructor support I implemented constructors and destructors. This was the one thing I was missing for my own project. See the attachment. Can I push it? Herman _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
