On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:19:10 +0100 ian <sibian0...@gmail.com> wrote: > My main point is so far "why not implement then a * operator dedicated > to vectors" ???? > Believe me, from what I did in languages programmation, overwiting > such a standard operaor is ALWAYS a very bad idea......
I fully agree. Who am I? I just lurk on this mailinglist, but operator overloading is something I hope stays out of C forever. If you have ever had to wade through a multitude of header files to figure out what an operator does on a certain object, I think you'll know what I mean. So never add it to C. It's a slippery slope. Regards, Ivo _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
