Oh whoops. You're right, sorry for wasting time.
Thanks for responding. On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:12 AM Christian Jullien <eli...@orange.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > > > C11 defines thoses macros (section 6.10.8.3) with __STDC_ prefix (not > __STD_) and they exist with tcc when you pass –std=c11 flag. They are > undefined with default flags. > > > > See libtcc.c(1842) > > > > C. > > > > *From:* Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis= > orange...@nongnu.org] *On Behalf Of *UnknownGamer40464 . > *Sent:* Friday, January 10, 2020 05:44 > *To:* tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > *Subject:* [Tinycc-devel] C11 __STD_NO_THREADS__ and __STD_NO_ATOMICS__ > are not defined > > > > These macros do not appear to be defined by the compiler, resulting in > code that selects for custom implementations instead using the nonexistent > standard versions anyways, despite the compiler not supporting either one. > > > > Without these definitions, I can't have TCC select for a custom > implementation of the C11 threading or atomics API. > > > > Would it be possible to have the compiler define them? > > > > Also thanks for all your work so far keeping TCC alive. > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel >
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
