Hello, as I was working on fixing _Static_assert bug,
I've saw that it was fairly easy to add C2x _Static_assert
syntax support to tinycc.

the code is here: https://github.com/cosmo-ray/tcc/commits/static_assert_c2x

The only difference with current _Static_assert is
that we can omit the literal string.

Is the code okay ?

Are you ok to introduce C2x feature to tinycc ? (gcc allow this too)

I won't push this if I don't have a go from peoples here
because C2x isn't standard yet.

Matthias,

_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Reply via email to