Michael Matz <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, I think that's merely a typo in Arnolds email.  The inconsistency is 
> there, applying unary '-' to a NaN doesn't change the sign of it in TCC.

Yep, that was the issue. Sorry I wasn't clear.

> So the current "-0.0-x" expansion of unary '-' needs a change.  It turned 
> out to be a bit uglier than I wished for, but alas, fixed in mob.

It now works for me. Thanks for the fix!

> Thanks for the report, Arnold.

You're welcome.

Take it easy,

Arnold

_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Reply via email to