Ok, what exact parts do you suggest to change? For now I see that dropping __cplusplus guards should make the code C++-free; please, correct me if I'm wrong.
ср, 27 янв. 2021 г., 01:29 Kyryl Melekhin <k.melek...@gmail.com>: > Dmitry Selyutin <ghostman...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Except to the extent which they're not, which is clear from the fact > that > > I was able to recognize that as clang's header. > > > > I don't object to marking it as clang-derived. I can also copy the > > copyright notice. > > > > > Why should the Tiny _C_ Compiler's headers be compatible with c++? > > > > Because this is the direction which will most certainly be reflected in > the > > future standards, in C++ for sure. If it's not difficult to keep it > > compatible, I don't see why it should not be compatible. I cannot predict > > how and why this header can be re-used, though. > > C++ support statements should be avoided simply because > it is not consistent to the rest of the codebase. If you want to > build it with cpp compiler having that one file is pointless. > Nothing will work anyways. Also gcc now depends on c++ which > I think was their greatest mistake and downfall. Please don't > make this happen with tcc. >
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
