On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Dmitry Selyutin wrote:
+/* memory models */ + DEF(TOK___ATOMIC_RELAXED, "__ATOMIC_RELAXED") + DEF(TOK___ATOMIC_CONSUME, "__ATOMIC_CONSUME") + DEF(TOK___ATOMIC_ACQUIRE, "__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE") + DEF(TOK___ATOMIC_RELEASE, "__ATOMIC_RELEASE") + DEF(TOK___ATOMIC_ACQ_REL, "__ATOMIC_ACQ_REL") + DEF(TOK___ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, "__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST")
Should these be tokens? I think it makes more sense for them to be preprocessor macros, as in gcc/clang.
+ DEF(TOK___atomic_store, "__atomic_store") + DEF(TOK___atomic_load, "__atomic_load") + DEF(TOK___atomic_exchange, "__atomic_exchange") *snip*
GCC uses those same names for intrinsics with different semantics. (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html)
I think supporting the GCC intrinsics would be cool, but that failing that we shouldn't collide with their names.
-E _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
