Perhaps this letter got missed; any help and tips are welcome. сб, 30 янв. 2021 г., 00:16 Dmitry Selyutin <ghostman...@gmail.com>:
> Hello, > > I work on support for std atomics and currently attempt to switch from the > initial idea of calling the routines to inlining the assembly code. > Unfortunately I'm lost in the relationships between the code generator and > SValue stack. > > Let's say I have a pair of values stored in SValue stack, and want to load > them into the registers %rdi and %rsi, and exactly these. This, I presume, > means that, unlike for situation with function call, I have to save the > registers. > Then some of the assembly code is generated via g()-like routine. After > this code, I'd like to push the fact that the code, in fact, generated %rax > as result. > Then, once we're done, the original values for %rdi and %rsi are restored. > > Basically I'd like to make it function-call-like, only that it is intended > to be inlined. > > Could you, please, point me to the correct direction, or provide a minimal > working example? >
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
