N'morning. grischka wrote in <6105b650.90...@gmx.de>: |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |> grischka wrote in |> <6102f8d1.40...@gmx.de>: |>|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |>|> The enum adds quite a bit on top of it; the addition of |>|> set_W_flag() is, hmm, not nice, but i hope the current approach is |>|> not too heavy. |>| |>|Maybe not heavy really but unnecessary, in quite some aspects. |>|One of them that after all tinycc currently does have only |>|2 warnings where all that bit-mask fuzz can develop. |>| |>|Just in case, below the commands how you can revert this more |>|or less cleanly: |>| |>|$ git revert -n 2709b7 49cd6f 0d59ac 0c1676 a7a138 |>|$ git commit -m "revert experimental -W[no-]error=X ..." |>| |>|Take care ... |> |> \o/ |> Greetings to the Microsoft world! | |Greetings from the blatant uncomplexers
Well hmm that is debatable. |https://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/commitdiff/4b2c6cf3 But that not, if course. Nice that someone who knows the generator agrees it is doable like that. Ciao. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
