Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote in <cf92e478-cdb6-57ae-63a8-eae5f123a...@gmail.com>: |Thanks fo reply ! | |Again even if it's valid C code it's clear that it has several drawbacks |pointed so far by other comments on this thread and if there is a more |clean/clear/elegant way to express it why not talk/try it out ?
Yes. After having used the x+y syntax ever since i, well, understood pointers (it was a happy day!!) i "just recently", i had to look, but very likely not before 2020, came to the &x[y] syntax *generally* (used it here and there, also for the reason of being in-sync) after having seen "the very great ones" where using that in the 70s (iirc). (And to mention that the x+y caused problems like the subject in the past, whereas &x[y] "always" worked (for me).) (Off-topic, but hey -- all that stupid, use a memory-safe language, or rust (eh, rest) in hell! Says the wind.) --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) | |And in Fall, feel "The Dropbear Bard"s ball(s). | |The banded bear |without a care, |Banged on himself fore'er and e'er | |Farewell, dear collar bear _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
