On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 2:00 AM grischka via Tinycc-devel < tinycc-devel@nongnu.org> wrote:
> On 12.12.2024 21:37, Scott Graham wrote: > > Hi, > > > > But would it make sense to restore the behaviour for normal `tcc -run` > uses? > > Sure it makes sense. Fixed now. (The logic still relies on 'ret' in > the first place but keeps its original value when s->nb_errors == 0. > Thanks for the quick fix! Works for me. scott (apologies for the earlier double-post too, mailman bested me. :) > >
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
