On 18.09.2025 11:27, noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel wrote:
noneofyourbusiness <noneofyourbusin...@danwin1210.de> wrote:tested with musl (shouldn't make a difference vs. glibc): ./configure --dwarf=5 --config-musl --debug --enable-static make ; make testforgot about export CC=tcc - it works fine with e.g. clang
Running tests against an installed tcc has only limited meaning. Obviously if a new test was added after a fix or new feature then an old installed tcc won't compile that correctly. Also, what's the problem with tcctest.c & musl there: https://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/commitdiff/8f23997ca7c7bd34756bbbae1f5363afec422907 From the comment I can't figure out what it is. "despite being defined in tcc's own stddef.h, intended to be included by libtcc.h, libtcc.h actually included the libc's standard include" ??? I mean if things don't happen as indented then why don't you fix that? -- gr _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
