Often it is _Complex hit first when developers try to compile musl-libc with tcc which is what's opening the can of worms discussed. sorry if that confused anyone. In case of musl-libc easiest solution is: $ rm -rf src/complex (see live-bootstrap/steps/musl), and then label this C11 if you wish. Otherwise, looking forward to the patchset for _Complex.
Next problem you'll probably encounter with tcc/musl-libc is dynamic-linking. Easiest solution then is static-linking. Enjoy On 2026-08-14 08:28, Sam Ellicott wrote: > > I was wondering if any has attempted or started to work out implementing > > _Complex? > > If not I would like to attempt it 😊 > > I would say go for it. Hopefully the lengthy discussion that the > thread morphed into didn't dissuade you. > Thanks, > -Sam Ellicott > Soli Deo Gloria > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
